Search for: "Democratic Party v. Board of Elections" Results 301 - 320 of 594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2022, 9:50 am by Amy Howe
Two lower courts had rejected the legislators’ request, reasoning that the state’s Democratic attorney general and the board of elections were already defending the law, but the justices reversed those rulings. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Bush nominated Pryor to the 11th Circuit in 2003, but the nomination stalled after Senate Democrats criticized Pryor for several incidents. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am by jonathanturley
” Some warned the Democratic task force that they would not vote for the party unless they received money before the 2024 elections. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Bruce Rauner, the newly elected Governor of Illinois, has launched what some see as direct attack on public unions. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
The insurrectionists were ultimately unable to block the Congressional certification of Joseph Biden as president-elect and Kamala Harris as vice president-elect. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm by Clinton Fein
Election years exacerbate the problem even further. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
   That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
Judge Mehta’s opinion provides a clear rejection of Trump’s arguments that Congress lacks a legitimate legislative purpose—an argument Trump is making across the board in order to reject oversight attempts by House Democrats. [read post]