Search for: "Department of Employment v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 4,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
In its brief the Justice Department claimed that the EEOC was “not speaking for the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 11:57 am
On January 5, 2010, United States District Court Judge Bernice B. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
” See Buckley v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:22 am
In Clift, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. said that if the employer discharges an employee without having either given him the opportunity to use the vacation he has earned, or in the alternative, compensating him with its monetary value, it transgresses the due process requirements of both the New York State and United States Constitutions and it should not be permitted to do so.The Third Department, however, decided that Clift has… [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
The United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari in City of Ontario v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:05 am
On June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Quon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In a recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Lupyan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:18 am
In Seybert v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Readers may recall I once blogged about a similar case, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
” In Kyllo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:55 am
You may travel outside of the U.S. and be readmitted as a V, if you have a valid passport and obtain a V visa form the Department of State. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
Employers and other employee benefit plan sponsors, benefit plan fiduciaries, and their advisors and service providers should review and update their health and employee benefit plan’s definitions of “spouse,” “marriage” and “dependent” in light of new guidance from the Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division (WHD) guidance under the Family & Medical Leave Act and the Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA)… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 11:12 am
Joe and Thomas V. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am
Dallas County,[1] the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, handed down a significant Title VII ruling that has far-reaching implications for future employment discrimination cases in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:13 pm
United States, 212 U.S. 481 (1909); United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:12 am
The plaintiff is a commissioned officer of the Public Health Service, an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services, which is a "uniformed service" of the United States. 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States (Bad Men Treaty Provision)United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:31 pm
” Sivaraman v. [read post]
