Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. York"
Results 301 - 320
of 410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Title: Magner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
” (Bridges v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:41 pm
.) - Dunn NW v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:28 am
Settlement agreementsMcLean v Village of Sleepy Hollow, 166 F. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:03 am
The lawsuit, Robinson v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am
The focus, however, is on the issue that leads this abstract: what are the “right” tools in a multi-disciplinary world? [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
The employer, however, may not use the counseling memorandum or a performance evaluation to avoid initiating formal disciplinary action against an individual as the Fusco and Irving decisions by the Commissioner of Education demonstrate [Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396 and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373]. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:57 am
Early intervention counseling Tatum v Horn, 37 AD3d 285 Wayne Tatum appealed his dismissal from his position as a New York City correction office after being found guilty of a number of allegations of misconduct. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
When a courageous California lawyer, Scott Drexel, was appointed as Chief Disciplinary Counsel to the California State Bar, he tried to change the system. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
In another Section 3020-a disciplinary action that involved considering public policy with respect to the penalty imposed, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that a disciplinary penalty consisting of counseling, remediation, and a 60-day suspension, violated a strong public policy. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
The Campbell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 am
V. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:39 am
" ** See Dobrin v. [read post]