Search for: "District of Columbia v. Armes"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
Then-Rep. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
.: The House Armed Services Committee's Future of Defense Task Force will hold its inaugural hearing on theories of victory. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia is a uniquely historically significant court. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:40 am
Back in January, I devoted my first column of the new year to the growing impatience of some members of the court for a chance to move the boundaries of the Second Amendment from the home — where its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
District Court for the District of Columbia to enforce the committee’s subpoena against former White House counsel Don McGahn. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:17 am
District Court for the District of Columbia to enforce the committee’s subpoena against former White House counsel Don McGahn. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which heard oral argument in the president’s appeal on July 12. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:20 pm
In that event, his dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:05 am
The District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
The District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
By way of background, recall that the Supreme Court decided in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit should nonetheless have heard Sudan’s limitations defense asserted through its timely, direct appeal; and (5) whether the undisputed fact of civil war, internal strife and partitioning of Sudan into two counties constitutes excusable neglect or extraordinary circumstances for vacatur under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
The District of Columbia v. [read post]
