Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 301 - 320
of 359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2010, 4:12 am
Court sustains Human Rights’ finding that the reasons advanced by employer for terminating employee was pretext for unlawful discriminationNew York State Office of Mental Health v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 06268, Decided on July 29, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBisi Asimolowo was employed by the Office of Mental Health as a pharmacy intern in 1992 and Asimolowo understood that he was expected to take and pass the… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:44 pm
· Should a physician who contracts with an integrative care center or medical spa be classified as an employee or independent contractor - Corporate Practice of Medicine Concerns · Employee v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Equity Group – Alabama Division d/b/a Keystone Foods v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:57 pm
These facts make up the allegations asserted by the plaintiff technician in DiLisciandro v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:20 am
In addition to the opinion of three doctors that Moss was capable of gainful employment with restrictions, the Division presented evidence that light duty work was available to Moss. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
62/09, The Queen, on the application of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency; the NHS Confederation (Employers) Company Ltd is potentially of great importance to at least one class of intellectual property owners -- the proprietary pharmaceutical sector. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
In Fore v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
Ponsi v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
Since the doctor's conduct went beyond his "scope of employment," the Appellate Division, First Department, thought St. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:08 am
Unemployment Insurance claim rejected following resignation found not medically necessaryMatter of Cartarius-Macri v Commissioner of Labor, 39 A.D.3d 994Laura M. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:59 am
Yurow v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm
Read the complete ruling: Loreto v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:55 am
” Field Operations Handbook (FOH), Wage and Hour Division, U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:28 am
Appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel when qualifying an applicant for employmentMatter of City of New York v New York City Civ. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 8:15 am
As Eric explains it, the New York's Appellate Division First Department said that these doctors, can be sued if certain conditions exist. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:07 am
Within the past few months the name change and other decisions made on behalf of the members (some without member consultation) have, in my opinion, and I am sure the opinion of others, wasted time and created unnecessary division between members and the organization. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
In Badalto v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:59 pm
Hedgepath v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:36 pm
” Since it was Justice Scalia that first announced, in Employment Division v. [read post]
