Search for: "Doe 29"
Results 301 - 320
of 24,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 8:52 am
This is great headline fodder (or click bait), but does it really add up? [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:36 am
This determination clearly does not only depend on the wording of the contract or national laws, as the Court’s jurisprudence has consistently found. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:28 am
(E.D.N.Y. 7-29-2011): Parents disagreed with the NYC DOE recommendations, placed their autistic child at the Rebecca School and sought reimbursement. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:38 pm
., 351 NLRB No. 29 (Sep't. 29, 2007), holds that: We hold that... [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 12:02 pm
September 29, 2008) [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:32 am
”29 CFR §541.602(a). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:21 pm
The main question, as formulated by the Swedish Svea hovrätt when it referred Svensson to the CJEU, is indeed the following: If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC (the InfoSoc Directive)? [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:54 am
Sept. 29, 2017), that part C of the “ABC” test does not require an individual to operate an independent business engaged in the same services as that provided to the putative employer to be considered an independent contractor. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
This podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:46 pm
Federal law requires no such foundation but does require that it be shown to opposing counsel upon request.Both New York law and federal law require that the witness be given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement if extrinsic evidence (outside proof) is introduced to prove the statement’s existence.An interesting twist here is the fact that the prosecution is impeaching its own witness. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:46 pm
Federal law requires no such foundation but does require that it be shown to opposing counsel upon request.Both New York law and federal law require that the witness be given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement if extrinsic evidence (outside proof) is introduced to prove the statement’s existence.An interesting twist here is the fact that the prosecution is impeaching its own witness. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:10 pm
Federal law requires no such foundation but does require that it be shown to opposing counsel upon request.Both New York law and federal law require that the witness be given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement if extrinsic evidence (outside proof) is introduced to prove the statement’s existence.An interesting twist here is the fact that the prosecution is impeaching its own witness. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 12:55 am
However, paternity cases might find a back door into IC 29-3- 3-6 via IC 31-17-2-11. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
While this order does not immediately end the “unreasonable delay” to which the plaintiffs have been subjected, it does offer them some prospect of certainty (if not full relief) at some point in the near future. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:46 pm
On 29 September 2011 the summons was served on one of the sureties, Mr September. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 1:03 pm
In short, that everyone does it doesn’t mean you can, too. [read post]
