Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50" Results 301 - 320 of 4,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2019, 9:56 am by Brett Holubeck
Unemployment is at a 50 year low (it is around 3.6%) There are around 1 million more job openings vs. potential applicants at this point in time, and the reality is that immigration and finding candidates that can come to the US to work is getting more difficult under the current administration. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
Henderson, 92 NY2d 677, 679 (1999) and [Criminal Procedure Law of New York] 100.40(1)(c))). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:02 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Even though the technical standard is that the defendant must be proven to be more than 50 percent negligent, the practical standard is much higher as many juries need a lot more than 51 percent negligent to find a defendant liable. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:27 am by Patent Arcade Staff
John Does 1-50.On Wednesday, July 1 the company brought suit against Phillip Labrasca for infringement of its trademark ZYNGA and violation of its Terms of Service for its Texas Hold ‘Em Poker game. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:56 pm by Elie Mystal
Why does this administration suck? [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:15 pm by K&L Gates
Plaintiffs sought to compel Defendants’ response to two questions: “(1) what efforts they made to comply with plaintiffs’ previous discovery requests, and (2) what procedures or methods were used to search for responsive electronically stored information. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 7:25 am by Giles Peaker
Therefore the defendant had a right pursuant to schedules 1 and 2 of the two leases to enter Flat 4 and turn off the gas supply for that purpose. ii) Moving the gas pipe to the proposed location is not unreasonable. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 7:25 am by Giles Peaker
Therefore the defendant had a right pursuant to schedules 1 and 2 of the two leases to enter Flat 4 and turn off the gas supply for that purpose. ii) Moving the gas pipe to the proposed location is not unreasonable. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Philip Thomas
The defendant also contends that if the jury does find for the plaintiff, then a reasonable verdict would be $50,000. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]