Search for: "Doe Nos." Results 301 - 320 of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
One does not act in good faith in the tax world by getting one’s tax advice from a dentist and from a convicted tax protester organizer. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patent Nos. 6,845,327 and 6,896,778 and asking the court to determine the legal title holder of the patents. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:19 am by Stanley D. Baum
The Court concluded that section 502(a)(3) authorizes equitable reformation of a plan that-as here- is shown, by clear and convincing evidence, to contain a scrivener's error that does not reflect participants' reasonable expectations of benefits. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
Nos. 4,816,567 and 6,331,415, which relate to antibodies and to non-specific immunoglobulins formed by recombinant techniques using host cell cultures. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm by Administrator
Professional Benefits Administrators, Nos. 11-3126/3640 (Aug. 20, 2012). [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 1:47 pm
Thanks to @glambert for including me as nos. 32, 45, 65 & 125 in the "'Must Read' Blog Posts of 2008" at [is.gd]. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:04 pm
Code § 55-7B-1, et seq., does not preclude application of the Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
I think the mark does have some incongruity and, like so-called double entendre marks, produces a bit of hesitation before one grasps the meaning of the mark. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm by Administrator
Professional Benefits Administrators, Nos. 11-3126/3640 (Aug. 20, 2012). [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Accordingly, True Value argued that the mark does not describe an appreciable number of its intended customers, but is instead merely suggestive of the "professional quality that a do-it-yourself homeowner can obtain from applicant's products. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Brown (Supreme Ct docket Nos. 11-338 & 11-347) [See WIMS 5/19/11]. [read post]