Search for: "Doe et al v. Trump et al"
Results 301 - 314
of 314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2025, 3:46 pm
Getty v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Geeklawyer, an IP lawyer, does manage to slip in a bit of law from time to time - but, mercifully, his blawg provides, for me, other attractions. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
STEVEN WYNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
Phelps, et al. (09-751). [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
Palm Beach Fire Fighter’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
As a consequence of this shift, the limitation on interest deductibility is anticipated to raise significantly more federal revenue after 2021 than it does initially. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
”[5] The Act does not provide a minimum period to receive comments on rule proposals.[6]But, a comment period of at least 60 days has been endorsed by the Administrative Conference of the United States for significant regulatory actions.[7] Further, executive orders issued by multiple past presidents from both political parties have all recognized the importance of a minimum 60-day comment period.[8] During the past four years, a significant number of proposals had comment periods… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
