Search for: "Doe v. City of Chicago" Results 301 - 320 of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
 The Chicago case does present that issue squarely, but again the law goes far beyond Cleveland's, and comes close to an outright ban on possession of most guns. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff sent his correspondence with the defendant to the main office in Chicago, and, on one occasion, met with his attorneys in that city. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 5:29 pm
City of Chicago (Nos. 05-4418, 05-4450, 05-4451 (Sep. 13, 2007), because the exercise of eminent domain is not a "land use" regulation under the Act; opinion here; oral argument mp3 here) -- for the Hawaii Supreme Court's treatment of the same issue, see Sherman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
I see no reason to assume without deciding that the Act implicates the First Amendment because our precedent leaves no doubt that it does. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
 And to be able to get it all… in just two days… while in the fabulous city of Chicago in June… well… like I said… it’s a really special opportunity and one that doesn’t come around very often. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm by James Bickford
Meanwhile, the City of Chicago is already responding. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
City of Chicago (Circuit docket 08-4241). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
City of Chicago, Nina Totenberg at NPR predicts that a decision in favor of the petitioners will lead to a “torrent of other cases…that test a huge array of existing gun regulations. [read post]