Search for: "Doe v. Defendant A et al" Results 301 - 320 of 4,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
”Therefore the two Circuit Courts disagree on whether the Act preempts state-law claims for willful misconduct, but they and other circuits hold that the Act does not completely preempt other state-law claims, such as negligence claims.Petition for Certiorari 8/29/2022US Supreme Court Docket: Glenhave Healthcare LLC v Jackie Saldana, et al  Docket 20-56194Recommended Citation: Gelman, Jon L. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 11:27 am by Steven Cohen
Sunnyvale et al – United States District Court – Northern District of California – September 12, 2022) involves a claim filed by San Francisco Baykeeper against the cities of Sunnyvale and Mountain View. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
That would be especially true if a state law treats reasonable use of geolocation technology as an adequate defense when geography matters—for instance, when reasonable even if imperfect geoblocking attempts are seen as evidence of lack of intent to target a particular state for personal jurisdiction purposes,[24] or when reasonable geolocation attempts are seen as sufficient for determining that a defendant's copyright infringement happened within the court's… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:26 am by Steven Cohen
SILICA COMPANY et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Pennsylvania – August 23, 2022) involves a products liability action. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:42 am by Charles Sartain
Bradley Demolition & Constr., LLC, et al has the appearance of a Hatfield and McCoy-grade grudge match. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:59 am by Tim K. Garrett and Kristin Titley
Stacey Kincaid et al., Williams, a transgender woman, was originally incarcerated in women’s housing but was quickly moved to men’s housing at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center when officials learned that she was transgender. [read post]
  There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period… [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
”[11] For Gelbach, this “eminently reasonable admonition” does not impose any constraints on statistical inference in the courtroom. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:18 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Burrows et al v. 3M Company – United States District Court – Western District of Washington – August 12, 2022) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]