Search for: "Does, 1-13"
Results 301 - 320
of 21,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 12:54 pm
Because this Court has found the Final Rule violates the Spending Clause, there is no need to discuss the Plaintiffs’ argument that the Final Rule violates the non-delegation doctrine....This Court further finds that the Final Rule is arbitrary and capricious because the DOE (1) failed to address relevant factors and (2) and failed to consider important aspects of the problem. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:47 pm
”The case is not too long of a read, but it nevertheless does a thorough job of reviewing decisions addressing the Section 1 exemption (see pages 6-13 for the state of affairs). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in John Doe I v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:39 pm
§ 1983 claim, but does not cite 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:40 pm
Children Should Sit in the Back Also, kids younger than 13 should sit in the back seat. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:31 pm
Federal Trade Commission 16-345 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:53 am
Sources: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-13-bankruptcy-basics https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/form_b122c-1.pdf https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/form_b_122c-2.pdfRead More [read post]
12 May 2009, 9:02 am
This part of the ruling does not apply to sales which occur before August 26, 2009. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:17 am
Davis, No. 17-16511 (1-13-22)(Paez w/McKeown; dissent by Miller). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
§ 507(a)(1)(A) and a nondischargeable debt under 11 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 8:11 am
This case is not one of them.The case is Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 11:07 pm
Ct.) at paras. 12-13. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
§ 1325(b)(1)(B)). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
§164.512(e)(1). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Import Motors (1/7/13, pub. 2/5/13) 213 Cal.App.4th 587, review granted 5/1/13 (Case No. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
It is a 13 -page per curiam ruling, including a 1-page concurring option by Chief Justice Shepard. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:45 am
The Court denied the motion, ruling that means testing does not apply to the debtor in a chapter 7 case which was converted from chapter 13.The rationale of Fox is simple and based on the “plain language” of BAPCPA. 11 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:47 pm
From: Findlaw Summaries August 12-13, 2008 CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
(Section 524(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.) [read post]
