Search for: "Does 1-100"
Results 301 - 320
of 13,994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
How Does Chelation Therapy Work? [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:51 am
Senate Committee approved legislation yesterday 20-1 that would help pave the way for Washington to confiscate Russian assets and transfe [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The first offence is having a blood alcohol concentration over 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood within two hours of driving. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
The sentencing ranges that are applicable to shoplifting cases are as follows: Class C misdemeanor — under $100, fine of up to $500, no jail time Class B misdemeanor — between $100 and $750, jail term of not more than 180 days and/or fine of no more than $2,000 Class A misdemeanor — between $750 and $2500, jail term of not more than 1 year and/or fine of no more than $4,000. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Much of the world was riveted for two days earlier this month as lawyers chastised and defended Israel on the floor of the International Court of Justice in South Africa’s lawsuit alleging that Israel has been violating its obligations under the Convention against Genocide. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:04 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (ICE) recently updated the following form(s): Form I-942, Request for Reduced Fee (Edition Date: 12/20/23); and Form I-881, Application for Suspension of Deportation or Special Rule Cancellation of Removal (Pursuant to Section 203 of Public Law 105-100 (NACARA)) (Edition Date: 12/20/23). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:41 am
Research does not believe it will render anything useful or greatly improve the company’s revenues. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Does fuel qualify as a necessary item in this case? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
In the West one does not speak to Core Socialist Values to be embedded in social life by the vanguard; one speaks to social justice as a clu [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Does the diligent search need to be conducted each and every time a policy is issued or renewed? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
Plaintiff had alleged that Advanced Lighting should be treated as the alter ego of its subsidiary, Venture Lighting, because: (1) Venture Lighting is a wholly owned subsidiary of Advanced Lighting; (2) Venture Lighting and Advanced Lighting have common ownership; (3) Advanced Lighting sets sales and earning goals for Venture Lighting; (4) Advanced Lighting consolidates financial statements and submits a single tax return for itself and its subsidiaries; and (5) Advanced Lighting… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:06 am
In the following hearing before the court at Valencia (Juzgado de lo Mercantil nº 1), the claimant submitted that the defendant holds 100% of the share capital of its Spanish subsidiary and that mother and subsidiary should thus be treated as a single undertaking, according to the principles of competition law as established by the ECJ in Sumal. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:34 am
Albemarle apparently obtained close to $100 million in profits from the scheme. 2 — Ericsson ($206M). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
§ 15(e)(1)(B). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:47 am
Not that it is relevant to today's column, but this morning a question popped into my head: Does anyone miss Kevin McCarthy? [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
Does the CARES Act apply to your rental property and if so, what you must do differently. 13. [read post]
A Con Law Exam Featuring A Barter Ban, Discrimination Against an AroAce Couple, and Campaign Finance
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Section 3: Each violation of Section 1 of this Act shall be punishable by up to one year in prison and/or a fine or tax of up to $100 for each $10 of value in currency conversions. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
From a methodological perspective, the CJEU’s latest ruling does not fit squarely within the uniform reading of the GDPR that the Court had previously adopted with respect to the interpretation of Article 82 GDPR. [read post]
