Search for: "Does 1-13" Results 301 - 320 of 21,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 1:24 pm
PLLC today for more information on Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcies. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Other strategies include: Entrapment Insanity Infancy (for individuals under the age of 13 years) Compulsion Any of these strategies can be discussed and decided upon with a lawyer who has studied the case. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:54 pm by Howard Friedman
Because this Court has found the Final Rule violates the Spending Clause, there is no need to discuss the Plaintiffs’ argument that the Final Rule violates the non-delegation doctrine....This Court further finds that the Final Rule is arbitrary and capricious because the DOE (1) failed to address relevant factors and (2) and failed to consider important aspects of the problem. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:47 pm by H. Scott Leviant
”The case is not too long of a read, but it nevertheless does a thorough job of reviewing decisions addressing the Section 1 exemption (see pages 6-13 for the state of affairs). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:39 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 1983 claim, but does not cite 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:40 pm by Jay Knispel
Children Should Sit in the Back Also, kids younger than 13 should sit in the back seat. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:31 pm by Kate Howard
Federal Trade Commission 16-345 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:53 am
Sources: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-13-bankruptcy-basics https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/form_b122c-1.pdf https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/form_b_122c-2.pdfRead More [read post]
12 May 2009, 9:02 am
  This part of the ruling does not apply to sales which occur before August 26, 2009. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:17 am by Jon Sands
Davis, No. 17-16511 (1-13-22)(Paez w/McKeown; dissent by Miller). [read post]