Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2009, 5:28 pm
One of the obligations dealt with in the China - Publications report was paragraph 5.1 of China's Accession Protocol, which provides in part: 1. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In this revocation appeal Board 3.2.02 inter alia examined claim 1 of the fourth auxiliary request as to its compliance with A 53(c). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
No. 1, at 6, 8.) [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
High, 39 M.J. 82, 84-85 (C.M.A. 1994). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 9:58 pm
Here's the statute (via Lexis): 609.72 DISORDERLY CONDUCT Subdivision 1. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Not only does he have to wear an orange shirt, the shirt announces he's a prisoner. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:44 pm
Following up on the earlier post New SG Unlikely To Alter Fed Gov't's SCOTUS Arguments In Ceded Lands Case, which noted that the new Solicitor General has sought leave from the Supreme Court to participate in oral argument and for divided argument, here's the motion filed by the SG's office on January 29, 2009, which reveals that the Obama Administration does not appear to be materially altering arguments the federal… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 8:05 am
, so these needy cases may not be making their way into the system after 1/1/2008. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:43 am
Therefore, (1) automatic denial of statutory damages under HRS §101-27 in Condemnation 1 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of damages, (2) the court's conclusion that Condemnation 2 was not abated by Condemnation 2 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of whether the public purpose asserted in Condemnation 2 was pretextual.Slip op. at 5. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:32 pm
Therefore, (1) automatic denial of statutory damages under HRS §101-27 in Condemnation 1 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of damages, (2) the court's conclusion that Condemnation 2 was not abated by Condemnation 2 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of whether the public purpose asserted in Condemnation 2 was pretextual.Slip op. at 5. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:57 am
"Death case defendant sues for lack of lawyers," is Bill Rankin's report from the January 1 issue of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.A murder defendant who says it is "unconscionable" for him to have been denied legal representation for eight months is suing the head of the state's public defender system. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Court of Appeal confirming that plaintiff lawyers can use “ICBC” in their website domain name and that this does not lead to consumer confusion. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:36 pm
What does this have to do with Trent Lott? [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm
The question is: does David know who you are? [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:05 am
If he's happy and rich, does it really matter what his qualifications are? [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:30 am
Defense counsel: No objections, your honor.J: The court will admit State's Exhibit Number 1 into evidence.That's it. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:08 am
That is up from 39% in FY2005. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 8:52 pm
The remaining candidates are in the 1-2% range. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 11:45 pm
Craig: Article 1: Section 6 of the U.S. [read post]
