Search for: "Does I through Doe III"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 1:04 pm
Noting that the FISC has historically demonstrated a “strong preference” for resolving compliance incidents through additional procedures and safeguards, “rather than by imposing the extraordinary and final remedy of rescission,” the government’s brief urges the court not to rescind or modify the authorization orders outlined in its December 12, 2008 supplemental opinion. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
I have no reason to think any state is considering doing this. [read post]
21 May 2009, 9:34 am
I start to flip through the review protocol, which seems inordinately complicated. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Part I - Wrong Site Surgeries - The Board of Medicine - The Surgeon. ... 101k Wrong Site Surgery: Why Does This Continue to Happen? [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:25 am
As much as I think trade secrets are important to the success of a business, Apple's litigating against computer trade publications just does not seem right. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm
III. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:37 am
However, this does not mean that French employment lawyers will be unoccupied. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
The Act applies to any business which does business in California, and i) has annual gross revenues in excess of $25 million; ii) buys, receives, sells, or shares for commercial purposes, the personal information of 50,000 or more consumers, households, or devices; or iii) earns more than half of its annual revenue from selling consumers’ personal information. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Although Rodney Atkins’ advice “if you’re going through hell, keep on going” appears sound, winding through all the complexities of the ADA and FHA can seem like descending through all nine levels of hell. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
If one (oversight through information requests) can be enforced in courts, why can’t the other? [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
The Red Sole 2: Szpunar’s backChristian Louboutin v Van Haren Case C‑163/16 (February 2018)I debated whether or not to include this – Advocate General opinions aren’t the final word, and the CJEU does not always follow them. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Argument [I.] [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 10:45 am
I briefed and argued the case. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
Among other changes, the amendments: (i) require disclosure of decreases in ownership, control or direction of 2% or more; (ii) require disclosure when ownership falls below the 10% threshold; and (iii) enhance the level of detail required in early warning reports regarding the future intentions of acquirors and the purpose of the transaction. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 6:50 am
Asking whether inter partes review (IPR) operates unconstitutionally “by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:31 pm
It does this by making changes to the current marriage rite in the BCP -- without going through the constitutional formalities of changing the BCP itself! [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Does the patent system incentivize research? [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
One of those exclusions is for high taxed income per Code §951A(c)(2)(A)(i)(III), which reads: "any gross income excluded from the foreign base company income (as defined in section 954) and the insurance income (as defined in section 953) of such corporation by reason of section 954(b)(4). [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
[iii] Yawn. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:28 pm
It is with this in mind that Flora Sapio, Jean Mittelstaedt, Shaoming Zhou, and I thought it would be useful to consider these issues through the lens of a recently published essay that nicely raises some of these themes. [read post]
