Search for: "Downloader 54" Results 301 - 320 of 717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm by Kevin
(he was off by 54), and lawyers in the Justice Department's National Security Division. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  The upward trend for AmLaw 200 firms — 54 in 2012 and 37 in 2011 — is no surprise. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 am by S2KM Limited
Online S2P2J includes a search feature and download capability as well as link features to access individual book sections, appendices, footnotes, cases and statutes. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
You can also fill out an online evaluation form by downloading our free app from the Apple App Store or get it on Google Play. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cariveau: P didn’t allege that IP address owners were the ones who downloaded. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:30 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Consumer trust is falling. 54% of consumers (down from 57% in 2013) say they do not trust businesses with their personal information online. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
The man, who has yet to be identified, was riding a Suzuki GSX-R600 west in the inside lane of County Road 54 around 7:05 a.m. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
It made digital copies available for its Library Project partners to download for any uses that did not violate copyright laws. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”A similar situation may occur when a disclaimer aiming at establishing novelty over subject-matter of a conflicting application under A 54(3) is to be introduced. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:44 am
Thus, beginning in Poughkeepsie at 5:04 AM, and starting the train at 5:54 AM, was a significant change in schedule for Mr. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus there is no indication that the “JVT Patent Disclosure Form” in D1 relates to any specific patent application or patent or in particular to the present patent application.[2.5] The mere fact that the submitter of contribution D1 might have ticked the box that it was “not aware of any granted, pending or planned patents associated with the technical content of the Recommendation | Standard or Contribution” in point 2.0 of the “JVT Patent Disclosure Form” does… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
What has been said, or to use the terms of A 54(2), what has been “made available to the public” has to be put beyond reasonable doubt. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:28 am by farrah nagrampa
Podcasts finally experienced a slight uptick with the percentage of students who downloaded or listened to 1-5 Podcasts growing from 20% in 2012 to 30% in 2013, and those who downloaded or listened to more than five Podcasts increased marginally (from 15% to 16%). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus, (i) in view of the fact that A 54(5) EPC 1973 relates to “substances and compositions” only, (ii) in view of the link made in A 54(5) EPC 1973 to A 52(4) EPC 1973 and (iii) in view of the connection established by the EBA to A 54(5) EPC 1973 […], this board concludes that the EBA intended to allow the special form of protection only for those uses in the medical domain which concern products which qualify as “substances or… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This, however, does not apply to the present examination case.As a consequence, contrary to the appellant’s opinion, the criteria established by A 69 and its protocol and applied by a national court in litigation cases do not apply to substantive examination before grant.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Hence, the ED examined and decided upon a request that was (no longer) part of the proceedings and, thus, upon a text to which the appellant (no longer) agreed to in the sense of A 113(2).The provision of A 113(2) marks a fundamental procedural principle and is of such prime importance that any infringement of it must be considered to be a substantial procedural violation (see T 1854/08 [2.1]; T 690/09 [8]).[5] In addition to this infringement of A 113(2), the decision under appeal suffers from a… [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  In my office, my download speeds on the iPad 3 ranged from 14 Mbps to 32 Mbps, and my iPad Air download speeds were about twice as fast, ranging from 42 Mbps to 54 Mbps. [read post]