Search for: "Downs v. Powell" Results 301 - 320 of 536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  The Court failed timely to appoint counsel in Powell v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am by S
As we all know s.89, Housing Act 1980, cannot be read in any other way (see Powell at [62]), but is, in the context of possession hearings, compatible with Article 8 (Powell, at [64]).If s.89, can’t be read down, then the county court is going to be unable to consider an Article 8 defence at the warrant stage (six weeks will already have expired or if there is time left unlikely to be long enough). [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am by S
As we all know s.89, Housing Act 1980, cannot be read in any other way (see Powell at [62]), but is, in the context of possession hearings, compatible with Article 8 (Powell, at [64]).If s.89, can’t be read down, then the county court is going to be unable to consider an Article 8 defence at the warrant stage (six weeks will already have expired or if there is time left unlikely to be long enough). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
AriLaakkonen (Powell Gilbert), moderator of the second part of the panel,  began with a question and the first of many analogies. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
The Supreme Court handed down a huge decision in copyright law today, ruling in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:23 am by Bill Araiza
  In an opinion concurring in the decision to strike down the Iowa law in Kassel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  But we needn’t even consider such complexities because the bill does not provide that the funds in escrow can earn any interest to be paid to the legislators, and indeed says that the “remittance with respect to a [salary] payment deposited in [the] escrow account” shall be the “same [as] would apply . . . if the payment were not” ever placed in escrow, suggesting that only the salary itself (and no earnings on it) can be distributed to the legislator… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Launch of Westlaw UK Insight, online encyclopaedia of law Professor Stewart Purvis’ round up of the Newsnight sagas NUJ: Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture: Newcastle 2012 [video] In the Courts On 11 December 2012 judgment was handed down in the privacy case Price v Powell & Ors [2012] EWHC 3527 (QB). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Jefferson Powell argued for the state in this case. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Gideon
Realizing that an unaided layman may have little skill in arguing the law or in coping with an intricate procedural system, Powell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am by Inimai Chettiar
In 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor relied on Powell’s diversity rationale when deciding Grutter v. [read post]