Search for: "E v. G"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2023, 2:37 pm
Zayas, William G. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:59 am
DeGuilioReferred To: Michael G. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am
” Such a motion may be made “[a]t any time” (CPLR 3211 [e]). [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm
Schedule I has the most severe sentencing range, with Schedule V the least. [read post]
15 May 2023, 4:58 am
O’Mahony v Whiston is a perfect example. [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:00 am
Puisque la peine maximale pour cette infraction est passée de 5 à 10 ans en juillet 2015, l’accusé doit pouvoir bénéficier de la peine la moins sévère. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am
Douglas, who was a professor there at the time, and Douglas quickly took Fortas as his protégée. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
The functionality or ideas that lie behind the code is protected (SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 at §20-§37). [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
Global Pro Bono: Causes, Context, And Contestation / Cummings, Scott L., Editor.; Silva, Fabio De Sa E, Editor.; Trubek, Louise G., Editor. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
App. 3d 15, 28–29 (1st Dist. 2003), as modified on denial of reh’g (Nov. 10, 2003) recognized, a lawyer may not “escap[e] liability for knowingly and substantially assisting a client in the commission of a tort. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am
G. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 4:00 am
L’application de la Loi sur la sécurité privée à l’intimée ne cause pas de véritable entrave. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Bratton, 376 F Supp 3d 232, 279 [SDNY 2019] ["[E]ntrenched in Supreme Court case law is the principle that the First Amendment's protections for free speech include a constitutionally protected right to gather news"]; Higginbotham v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
Katharine G. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Over the past several years, the use of non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) has received significant public scrutiny following their controversial use in a number of high profile harassment claims.[1] NDAs were back in the headlines earlier this year following the leak to the Telegraph of around 100,000 Whatsapp messages belonging to the former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.[2] The messages, which revealed Mr Hancock’s communications with other members of the government during… [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:18 am
v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 3:59 am
L’accusée a plaidé coupable sous le chef d’accusation d’avoir omis de fournir les choses nécessaires à l’existence de sa fille, âgée de 7 ans au moment de faits. [read post]
