Search for: "Edwards v. United States of America" Results 301 - 320 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
The evil that Emperor Norton abolished, of course, was the Congress of the United States of America. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court had been asked to consider a challenge to an insider trading conviction. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
’”[1] It offers some enhanced protections to visual artists working in the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
("Acceding" to the national constitution and canons does not mean subordinating oneself to them, any more than the United States of America, by acceding to Charter of the United Nations, places itself under the absolute governance of that body.) [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
In 1993, the Swaps Monitor, an industry newsletter, reported that the derivatives market amounted to a total of US$24 trillion, representing approximately four times the size of America’s domestic product by that time. [3] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
  DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Voters in seven states weighed in on key contests in Tuesday’s primaries. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
They also drew on the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
By 1868, the First Insurrection was deeply seared into America's historical memory. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
But in January 1986, they were little known in America, where only a few thousnd had been sold. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]