Search for: "English v. English"
Results 301 - 320
of 11,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 2:08 am
Byers and Others v Yacht Bull Corporation and Another Chancery Division “The court had no jurisdiction to hear a claim by English liquidators to beneficial ownership of a yacht acquired by money from Madoff Securities International Ltd. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:49 am
Regina (Boggis and Another) v Natural England Court of Appeal "The notification of a site of special scientific interest by English Nature was not a plan or project requiring an assessment of its conservation implications on any special protection area which it might affect. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 1:01 am
The English, led by King Henry V, had between 6,000 and 9,000 men. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:51 am
In most respects, the American system of law and the English system of law are similar. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:00 am
As explained in the point V. above, when contracting for services the practice of the Crown is to leave the burden of compensating the patentee to its agents. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
In Southern Seeding Service, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 3:02 am
McDonnell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
This was the question asked in English v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:40 am
Cardozo School of Law) have posted English Translation of Sabam V. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
Many years ago, in a junior high school English exam, this Kat wrote a phrase she had encountered several times in English magazines and American movies, etc.: ‘Long time no see’. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
There is no question of staying the proceedings on the basis of forum non conveniens because Associated Newspapers Limited is an English company and there is, therefore, an absolute right for a claimant to sue it in the courts of this country under Article 2 of the Brussels Convention (see the decision of the CJEU in Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land: In Plain English
10 Dec 2018, 10:54 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am
Let’s discuss – in Plain English. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:34 am
Author The Judicial Office, UK Licence CC BYSA 4.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) and another [2021] EWHC 2198 (Pat) (2 Aug 2021)This case shows how quickly the English courts can move to resolve disputes when there is a need for them do so. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Atnold) Allergan, Inc and another v Aspire Pharma Ltd [2019] EWHC 1085 (Pat) (3 May 2019) Allergan Inc is the proprietor of European patent EP1753434 for an enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution which its English subsidiary, Allergan Ltd. exploits by marketing a product containing 0.1 mg/ml (0.01%) bimatoprost for ophthalmic [read post]
