Search for: "English v. English" Results 301 - 320 of 9,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am by Lisa McElroy
  Let’s discuss – in Plain English. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:34 am
Author The Judicial Office, UK Licence CC BYSA 4.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) and another [2021] EWHC 2198 (Pat) (2 Aug 2021)This case shows how quickly the English courts can move to resolve disputes when there is a need for them do so. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Atnold)  Allergan, Inc and another v Aspire Pharma Ltd [2019] EWHC 1085 (Pat) (3 May 2019)  Allergan Inc is the proprietor of European patent EP1753434 for an enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution which its English subsidiary, Allergan Ltd. exploits by marketing a product containing 0.1 mg/ml (0.01%) bimatoprost for ophthalmic [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
The significant point of the judgement is not the result of English assets being remitted... [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am by INFORRM
Furthermore, Google Spain had no bearing on how English law should approach a contention that a given defendant was liable for breach of Article 8. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am by Amy Howe
   That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Lisa McElroy
  In my inbox are all kinds of questions from Plain English readers – how could the Court do this? [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am by Lisa McElroy
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm
The claimants were two software houses, one English and the other American, which were at [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:34 am
In Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980, the Court of Appeal ruled that the judge at first instance, Judge Beatson, was entitled to conclude that English proceedings would serve a useful purpose when he refused to set aside a service out of the jurisdiction of negative declaratory proceedings by Faraday against Howden.In the Commercial Court decision, Beatson J refused to set aside the service because he found that the policy in… [read post]