Search for: "English v. English"
Results 301 - 320
of 9,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
There is no question of staying the proceedings on the basis of forum non conveniens because Associated Newspapers Limited is an English company and there is, therefore, an absolute right for a claimant to sue it in the courts of this country under Article 2 of the Brussels Convention (see the decision of the CJEU in Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am
Let’s discuss – in Plain English. [read post]
Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land: In Plain English
10 Dec 2018, 10:54 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:34 am
Author The Judicial Office, UK Licence CC BYSA 4.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) and another [2021] EWHC 2198 (Pat) (2 Aug 2021)This case shows how quickly the English courts can move to resolve disputes when there is a need for them do so. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Atnold) Allergan, Inc and another v Aspire Pharma Ltd [2019] EWHC 1085 (Pat) (3 May 2019) Allergan Inc is the proprietor of European patent EP1753434 for an enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution which its English subsidiary, Allergan Ltd. exploits by marketing a product containing 0.1 mg/ml (0.01%) bimatoprost for ophthalmic [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
The significant point of the judgement is not the result of English assets being remitted... [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:34 pm
First up was Holt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
Furthermore, Google Spain had no bearing on how English law should approach a contention that a given defendant was liable for breach of Article 8. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm
A group not involved in Lyon v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:59 pm
Aereo, Inc., in Plain English. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
That is the question before the Court this morning in Bond v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm
In a case decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court called State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:37 pm
Last week in King v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
Attorneys on the case, Ling v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
In my inbox are all kinds of questions from Plain English readers – how could the Court do this? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:38 am
At issue in Kasten v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]
