Search for: "English v. Jones"
Results 301 - 320
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
Far from being revolutionary, Dow Jones v Gutnick has proven to be a straightforward application of common law principles to an entirely expected outcome. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:48 am
Jones, 12 Gratt. (53 Va.) in 1855. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
We used to do a fortnightly post giving links and the abstracts to the articles published in the Social Science Research Network that are related to arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
A statement in a balance sheet presented to a creditor-shareholder of a Company and signed by the Directors or their agents is sufficient acknowledgement (Jones v. [read post]
“Blackmail” costs system violated Daily Mirror’s freedom of expression rights in Naomi Campbell case
18 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision is here. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:58 am
Jones, 2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
Jones, 600 F.3d at 858. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
The spectre of “image rights” was also raised in the well known Catherine Zeta-Jones/Michael Douglas wedding photograph case, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:22 pm
There have been a number of posts about the Jameel jurisdiction to strike out/stay and a number of recent decisions Ronaldo v Telegraph [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) and Mardas v v New York Times Co [2009] EMLR 8. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
There is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
The defendants’ grounds for the application to strike out were as follows: That the claim and its real purpose was to circumvent the rule in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers Limited [1993] AC 534 (“Derbyshire”)] which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a governmental body, from suing for libel; That its effect was circumvent the rule which prevents the Governing Body of Durand School, as a public authority and hence a body without Article 8 ECHR rights, from… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
But I think the logic of the Court’s decision encompasses all civil court decisions about what is the right interpretation of legal doctrine (as opposed to questions, which arise in religious exemption schemes, about whether a claimant sincerely believes in a particular interpretation), especially given the later decision in Jones v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
Jones (1880), 5 App. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
The doubts about Mr J's evidence even extended to his knowledge of English: Mr. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
The doubts about Mr J's evidence even extended to his knowledge of English: Mr. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
So if an English “Pastor” Jones preached a sermon or gave a public lecture, attacking Islam then the fact that some muslims might react violently would not make the sermon or lecture criminal. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Henry, 125 F.3d 1305, 1309 (9th Cir.1997) (citing English v. [read post]
