Search for: "Ex Parte Browne" Results 301 - 320 of 803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In its March 20, 2012 decision in Rabinovich v Shevchenko, 93 A.D.3d 774, 941 N.Y.S.2d 173, the Second Department agreed with that part of the decision of Suffolk County Supreme Court Justice Donald R. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Amici express no opinion on the procedural questions raised in Part IV of McCauley's brief.) [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:17 pm
" The USPTO also cites In re Best, 562 F.2d 1262 and Ex parte Grey, 10 USPQ2d 1922. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:05 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
  The court ruled that the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants was: 1) affirmed in part, since the plan was required to distribute the funds to the ex-wife as the named beneficiary; but 2) reversed in part, because the estate could bring an action against the ex-wife to enforce her waiver and recover the disputed plan proceeds. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
Chief Judge Garland, immediately seized on this last part: wasn’t uncertainty a consequence of the prosecution’s decision to stick Al-Bahlul with legally doubtful conspiracy charges in the first place? [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
The Supreme Court said in 1942’s Ex Parte Quirin (the Nazi saboteurs case) that a military commission could try defendants for violations of the law of war, which the Court depicted as predominantly, if not exclusively, international in nature. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:16 am by SHG
  That's not enough.The popularity of a blawg is, in part, based upon creating a community of people who find something of value to read. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
 This is part one…* UPC Mock Trial - a Kat reports from Paris - Part deux… and this is part two -- pardon, deux.* Posh wash or Porsche? [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:08 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: SCOTUS Supreme Court Watch: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 – from Maribeth Minella at the Delaware Employment Law Blog SCOTUS: Is an oral complaint protected conduct under FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision? [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 5:12 am by SHG
” This is part of a stylistic choice that raises far more questions than it answers. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:58 pm by charonqc
Lord Paul is not part of the ‘directing mind and body’ of the Labour Party. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:52 pm by Orin Kerr
W. 1107, 1110 (1903); Ex parte Hurn, 92 Ala. 102, 112, 9 So. 515, 519—520 (1891); Thatcher v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  A so-far unnamed party has now requested reexamination of Walker’s ‘505 patent (see ex parte Request No. (10). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  A so-far unnamed party has now requested reexamination of Walker’s ‘505 patent (see ex parte Request No. (10). [read post]