Search for: "Ex Parte Matter of United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
” It further permits court-ordered ex parte seizure of property in “extraordinary circumstances” to prevent “dissemination of the trade secret. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
Kammen states that the government recognizes that the detainees have a habeas right, but also that the United States is not obligated to comply with an order from an Article III or military commission judge. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:27 am
United States that the Ex Post Facto Clause prohibited prosecution in a military commission of material support for terrorism or solicitation—neither of which is a crime under international law—for conduct that predated the 2006 act making them offenses triable by commission. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Chanel established that it began using its mark in the United States in the 1930s, and the mark has consistently been ranked as one of the most recognized and famous brands in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
” at all, as in ex parte matters). [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am
The District Court passed an ex-parte order in November 2014 injuncting the ICC from proceeding with the arbitration. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:30 am
The District Court passed an ex-parte order in November 2014 injuncting the ICC from proceeding with the arbitration. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm
Arriva Medical at the Eleventh Circuit, sending each case back to the appellate courts “for further consideration in light of United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Indeed, given the placement of the comma after the phrase "Constitution of the United States," one might even contend that Judge Luttig's reading is preferable--purely as a matter of punctuation--than the alternative reading. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:31 pm
—It shall be the policy of the United States, with respect to matters pertaining to cyberspace, cybersecurity, and cyber warfare, that the United States should employ all instruments of national power, including the use of offensive cyber capabilities, to deter if possible, and respond when necessary, to any and all cyber attacks or other malicious cyber activities that target United States interests with the intent to—… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:43 am
The summary military trial and execution of some of these Germans is the subject of the Supreme Court case Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
