Search for: "Express Services, Inc." Results 301 - 320 of 6,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
When the challenged work is used as a trademark connoting source identification of goods or services, trademark protections under the Lanham Act maintain their full force with no First Amendment exception for the expressive work. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:50 pm by Chris Sutton
Any views or opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily the views of any client. [read post]
  Background In 2012, relator Jesse Polansky filed a qui tam action alleging that his employer, Executive Health Resources, enabled its hospital clients to over-admit patients by certifying inpatient services that should have been provided on an outpatient basis and then billed those services to Medicare. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:42 am by Colin Zick
The FTC’s position is that you need consumers’ affirmative express consent for any new uses of their data. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued two Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the Pfizer, Inc. and the ModernaTX, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[1] The Case In the District Court , Ninth Circuit and Oral Argument in the Supreme Court Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
To the extent that trademarks subsist in those names, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:33 am by Richard West
Customers will continue to access the company’s existing services and products without interruption. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. that a company whose owners opposed contraception on religious grounds did not have to provide its employees insurance that covered contraception. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]