Search for: "Express Way Ltd."
Results 301 - 320
of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913, 916 (2005). [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
” Finally, Mr Stirling submitted that there was nothing by way of antidote to the defamatory sting complained of. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm
Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913, 916 (2005). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
” EM Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
That such a result should be brought about without any express reference to the massive extension which was being effected would be most surprising. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Frankfort Digital Services Ltd. offered an online service that let the consumer prepare bankruptcy petitions. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
” The expression does not support the enlargement of Convention rights in a way not previously recognised in Strasbourg jurisprudence.[190] Charities and the question of “ [read post]
1 May 2011, 1:14 pm
The Court held that Canbar had adopted the contract made in the name of Can-West, in two ways. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
It is over-complex, placing far too many hurdles in the way of a successful invocation. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
Back in December 2008 Mr Justice Arnold delivered a major trade mark infringement and passing off judgment in Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
It’s the biggest case of the term, Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
While one cannot isolate the profits attributable to the campaign, it is necessary and desirable to impose a penalty which is apt to affect in a substantial way the profitability of Optus’ misconduct. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:23 pm
Before going into the details, we should be clear that a) this is a non-binding first tier tribunal decision, b) it turns wholly on the specific lease clauses and the specific facts, c) it is not a precedent in any way, shape or form. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
What emerges is that the CJEU has developed seemingly different approaches for different types of case, and no express decision on burden of proof in any of them, only suggestions from the way the court expresses its rulings. (1) The “normal case”. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:22 am
The jiplp weblog features a review by Mr Justice Arnold on the economics of copyright which concludes with an expression of regret that it was not available to the Court of Appeal when it adopted the incremental costs rule in Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1419 [on which see the AmeriKat's posts here and here]. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
So they argue that “style, independent of any particular expression of it, is not protectible and thus does not form a proper object of comparison to the Frappuccino Works“. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
HOJ Industries Ltd. [read post]
27 May 2013, 1:39 pm
The filing of TM-58 form by the applicants was mala fide.Thus, the petition was dismissed.The Court also expressed its disapproval of the Registry’s outdated method of checking similarity of marks. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:44 am
Music Trading Online loses its appealOn Friday the Court of Appeal (Mummery, Rix and Lloyd LJJ) gave its ruling in Independiente Ltd and others v Music Trading Online (HK) Ltd, in which MTO appealed against the judgment of Mr Justice Underhill (see IPKat post here) that Independiente was entitled to sue MTO for breach of contract after that company breached its undertakings in a settlement agreement that it would not sell infringing CDs and DVDs online, and not just for contempt of… [read post]
