Search for: "Facebook v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am by Ngai Zhang
Although there are certain exceptions, such as one where the government may require disclosure of such information pursuant to a criminal investigation, California’s First District Court of Appeal in Facebook v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 pm by Jon Gelman
Refer to Chapter 1-1 of each chapter for a summary of Version 4.7 updates.Related articlesUS EPA Report Calls For Better Regulation of Demolition of Asbestos Containing Buldings (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)NJ Supreme Court to Review Ethics of Defense Firm Facebook Investigation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)The Path to Federalization: US Supreme Court Again Validates the Affordable Care Act (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)NJ Supreme Court:… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:48 am by Jeff Welty
He was convicted in district court and again in superior court, and appealed. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Takacs Holding Corporation, 2015 ONSC 3007 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice set aside a default judgment in the sum of Can$525,000 entered in 2012. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
Superior Court * Keyword Advertising Doesn’t Create General Jurisdiction–Rocke v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:19 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Repeat.Psychologists met in secret with Bush officials to help justify torture: reportConrad Black loses bid to have Supreme Court of Canada hear case over millions in back taxesB.C. teachers lose latest court fight on class size, compositionTen shocking details from the report on sexual misconduct in Canada's militaryExpert witnesses need not be independent, Supreme Court rulesProvince defends right to lay polygamy charge in Bountiful caseObese Canadians should be… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded general damages of Can$30,000 to the individual plaintiff in respect of five postings on a bulletin board which were accessed 742 times. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 23 February 2015, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the long running “blogger libel” case of Baglow v Smith 2015 ONSC 1175. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:16 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Judge Rules Labeling Homosexuality A Mental Disorder Is Fraud  Judge rejects media request to interview Omar Khadr Peel police deny handcuffing lawyer in her robesPeter MacKay’s friends, colleagues make up 6 of 9 judge appointees  SCC sides with Law Societies as part of terror and money-laundering law ruled unconstitutionalToronto lawyer arrested at Brampton court, allegedly smuggling drugs into courthouse  Abbotsford lawyer in living will case… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/6YyfKMRmiC -> No Personal Jurisdiction Over Nasty Facebook Post–Burdick v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/6YyfKMRmiC -> No Personal Jurisdiction Over Nasty Facebook Post–Burdick v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
The California Court of Appeal, in a nicely-reasoned opinion in Burdick v Superior Court, recently held that posting allegedly defamatory statements about a person on a Facebook page, even while knowing that person resides in the forum state [California, in this case], is insufficient in itself to create the minimum contacts necessary to support specific personal jurisdiction in a lawsuit arising out of that posting. [read post]