Search for: "Family Group, Inc. v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
” The court explains that the report also determined that around 50 percent of those who were inspired by foreign terrorist groups to attack the United States were U.S. citizens who were born in the United States, and that those who were not born in the United States were likely radicalized several years after they entered the United States. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
The injury in fact should be “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical” (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
Facebook’s minimum contacts with the United States are beyond dispute. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It simply referred to a line of prior cases that had squarely rejected the legal theory and deferred to them (as lower courts are bound to do).On appeal, however, the Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, one of the premier advocacy groups for LGBT rights in the United States took over her case. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The second case on the argument docket is Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, No. 16-470 (how closely must a state court “hew” federal court patent law precedents?) [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, No. 16-470 (how closely must a state court “hew” federal court patent law precedents?) [read post]