Search for: "Federal Express Corporation v. Focus Corporation" Results 301 - 320 of 562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
  The SEC staff withdrew its Whole Foods no-action letter and noted that it “will express no views on the application of Rule 14a-8(i)(9) during the current proxy season. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In its Conference of January 8, 2016, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work, and whether a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order denying class certification after the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their claims with prejudice. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
”[25]  Others have declined to impose sanctions for noncompliance, at least where the recipient is found to be acting in good faith, expressing “considerable discomfort to think that a court of law should order a violation of law, particularly on the territory of the sovereign whose law is in question. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Is it a C-level accountability and part of the day-to-day business focus? [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Condon v Canada, 2014 FC 250, the Federal Court of Appeal held that claims for negligence and breach of confidence could proceed as a class action. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am by Jim Sedor
By contrast, corporate-sponsored events are often free of any explicit legislative focus. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
 The focus should be on whether the physician reviewed relevant guidelines and other data to ascertain their applicability to the particular patient, . [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In Sheraton Corporation of America v Sheraton Motels Ltd [1964] RPC 202, the US hotel chain had an arguable case to justify an interlocutory injunction against use of its mark; the goodwill was based on the fact that customers living in the United Kingdom booked rooms in the plaintiff’s hotels through the plaintiff’s London office or through UK-based travel agents. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The system is also a one-way ratchet because corporations can sue, forcing governments to spend significant resources, while governments impacted by foreign corporations cannot bring any claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm by Florian Mueller
As Thomas Young has recently explained on his Copyright Culture blog, "[c]opyright law doctrines, such as scènes à faire, appear well suited to the task by delineating which expressions are copyrightable at the time of creation" but Google's proposed "focus on ex-post considerations, such as user familiarity, [would] undermine copyright's basic principles and threaten to penalize a copyright holder for creating a successful work that has… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
`In choosing the proper standard to apply, the district court should focus on the ‘nature’ of the [defendant’s] speech. . . . [read post]