Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 18,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 11:32 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of OregonOpinion Date: 2/16/10Cite: Precision Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:01 am
BIAX Corporation v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:39 pm
The fee schedule eliminates disputes over what constitutes a fair and reasonable charges in a Nebraska workers compensation case and in many other states.Contrast this with New Jersey, a state that doesn’t have a fee schedule in workers’ compensation. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:18 pm
In the matter of Gary Stolinski v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:53 am
In Octane Fitness v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:08 am
Detroit Board of Education, which stated fees could be collected for collective bargaining, but not for political purposes. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
In Laffitte v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 9:13 am
The recent case of Rhine Enters v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
On March 20, 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided the landmark decision of Travelers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:11 pm
Serrano v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Southern District of New York stated that it was “awarding [the defendant] its fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm
Art. 12(4) of the Indo-China DTAA defines “fees for technical services” as “any payment for the provision of services of managerial, technical or consultancy nature by a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting State…” [emphasis mine] Art. 12(6), the deeming provision, provides that “royalties or fees for technical services shall be deemed to arise in a Contracting State when the payer is … a… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm
“What are exorbitant fees? [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court today, on Wednesday June 27, 2018, reversed the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Janus v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In Harris v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:12 pm
Peter v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Yes, in the case of Collins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 10:54 am
The Federal Register Notice states that “[t]here is no specific language required for the written assertion, but it should be readily identifiable on the IDS and clearly convey the applicable IDS size fee by specifying the particular paragraph in § 1.17(v) that applies (e.g., “the fee due under 1.17(v)(2)”), if any. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:03 pm
The court stated that for each... [read post]
