Search for: "Felix v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Last year, in Loving v. [read post]
12 Oct 2024, 4:45 am
In DeLacey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
There, as in our class, is his stunningly self-assured dismissal of Marbury v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
But there is also, crucially, the development of a notion of a Constitution that becomes “fixed” and therefore made unchangeable (save for the near-futile path of constitutional amendment set out by Article V). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am
In 1949, federal district trial Judge Harold Medina issued criminal contempt specifications against the five lawyers representing the eleven members of the Communist Party tried and convicted of conspiracy in the case titled United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am
He also represented Clarence Earl Gideon in what became a landmark Supreme Court case, decision Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:49 pm
The Fund was created in October 1918 by the widow of Stephen V. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
In the 2009 case Montejo v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am
Kisor leans heavily, in its analysis, both on Chevron itself and on later opinions about the Chevron test, such as United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm
Bergeron, or Felix J. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
At oral argument, Justice Felix Frankfurter asked Hugh R. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
