Search for: "Fictitious Parties"
Results 301 - 320
of 860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am
The Court then applied the Ninth Circuit rules governing the use of fictitious names and found that Plaintiff had not met his burden in demonstrating the need to seal the action and use a fictitious name in the caption. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm
(b) By presenting to the Office or hearing officer in a disciplinary proceeding (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) any paper, the party presenting such paper, whether a practitioner or non-practitioner, is certifying that – All statements made therein of the party’s own knowledge are true, all statements made therein on information and belief are believed to be true, and all statements made therein are made with the knowledge that whoever, in… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Prior to trial, the parties stipulated that Beckett created the Facebook page and wrote all of the posts about Laughland. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
The Florida Democratic Party has returned $200,000 and the Florida Republican Party has given back $150,000. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:33 am
In fact, we explained how New York State is a one party consent state. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
Marks are checked against other marks registered in Indiana, but not against corporate, fictitious, or assumed names. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:29 am
Marks are checked against other marks registered in Indiana, but not against corporate, fictitious, or assumed names. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:15 pm
The Cable Privacy Act requires cable companies to inform subscribers before any of their confidential information is turned over.Under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, discovery may not commence until the parties have had a "meet and confer" under Rule 26(f). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:29 am
Marks are checked against other marks registered in Indiana, but not against corporate, fictitious, or assumed names. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:04 am
It’s a promise by one party (sometimes called the surety or guarantor) to pay a certain amount if another party fails to meet an obligation. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 5:24 pm
While unusual in that the criminal defendant is usually the party arguing that an order of restitution would be impractical or unduly complex, the DOJ's proposal makes a lot of sense. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:26 am
WJBF-TV, 952 F.2d 380, 383-84 (11th Cir. 1992) (“This Court has clearly held that a party can collect the expense of pursuing a Rule 11 claim. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:50 am
Many times the broker provides investors with fictitious account statements that contain values that the broker manipulates and controls. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Marks are checked against other marks registered in Indiana, but not against corporate, fictitious, or assumed names. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
Supp. 3d 401, 405-06 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (“other factors must be taken into consideration and analyzed in comparison to the public’s interest and the interests of the opposing parties”). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:12 am
In those cases, each defendant had accepted `friend’ requests from third parties, and the third parties provided the government with consent to use the `friend's’ computer account to view the files Sawyer and Ladeau shared with the third parties. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
The parties agreed that Rule 9(b) applied, and the court found the UCL claim pled with particularity. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:24 am
But a procedure where a third party (Google) is asked to honor injunctions in cases in which it wasn’t a party risks abuse — especially when the injunction comes from a default judgment (one in which the defendant never showed up) or a stipulated judgment (one in which the plaintiff and defendant agreed to the injunction). [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 11:08 am
"No doubt lots of parties would prefer to keep their disputes private. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:49 am
Most suits that have sought to hold sites responsible for defamatory content created by third-party users have been rejected by courts based upon CDA Section 230, which immunizes “interactive computer services” – such as a consumer review websites – where liability hinges on content independently created or developed by third-party users. [read post]
