Search for: "Fields v. Doe"
Results 301 - 320
of 9,483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 10:51 am
See Frye v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
This has never been precisely my field, but in my misspent youth (ok, my late 30s), I did some work at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), in the Laboratory of Neuropsychology (LN), so I thought I’d take a look at the underlying research. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
It was a new field. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
If the Opposer does not, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board may assume that these marks are in use. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
Although the TofuTown judgment focuses on the dairy sector, it does contain certain parallels to the present meat sector dilemma. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:28 am
This was exemplified with Zummo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
How does the third edition[12] treat peer review? [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Experts in the field have described this concept in the anti-dumping context in a figurative manner: “the assessment of whether dumped imports have caused injury is not an exact science”. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Experts in the field have described this concept in the anti-dumping context in a figurative manner: “the assessment of whether dumped imports have caused injury is not an exact science”. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Shiv Sidharth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Although the approach adopted will not be determinative of all future such applications, it does suggest a degree of levelling the playing field may be seen in the future, with parties encouraged to use a language common to both parties, limiting one potential inconvenience to defendants to being sued in a first instance division that otherwise might not be to their liking. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:52 pm
Indeed, the majority in Chevron ponders the idea that Congress leaves certain decisions to administrative agencies due to their expertise in the field, and that “judges are not experts in the field” that most agencies work under in their daily operations.[1] Such expertise was not considered by the Roberts Court in Biden v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:59 am
Questions about particular documents, such as “Does the Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:03 am
Idaho) in Scofield v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am
On 25 October 2023, HHJ Hacon (sitting as a High Court Judge), rendered his judgment in Philip Morris v Nicoventures[1]. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:11 am
Montgomery Law LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:22 am
—Bobby Knight 1Ash Meadows Townhome Assoc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:44 am
RLP Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
