Search for: "Fields v. Securities and Exchange Commission"
Results 301 - 311
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
Wall Street has successfully argued that Congress intended only the Securities and Exchange Commission to police fraud, not to open the door to lawsuits by private shareholders. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:51 am
Article 2 (Definitions) The definitions of terms used in this Act shall be as follows: 1.The term “real estate investment company” means any company that is incorporated pursuant to Article 5 mainly for the purpose of investing its assets in real estate and managing invested assets, which falls under each of the following items: (a) The self-managed real estate investment company: The company that has full-time officers and employees, including asset management specialists, on its… [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 11:49 pm
By a 7-1 vote in Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
Accomplice: Individual or individuals who voluntar Âily engage with another in the commission or attempted commission of a crime. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:00 am
Securities & Exchange Commission Irwin Stelzer, Senior Fellow and Director of Economic Policy Studies, Hudson Institute 3:30 - 4:45 p.m. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 7:12 am
Throw out the current insider trading laws and bus the Securities and Exchange Commission's lawyers over to the Justice Department, where they can concentrate on the real crime: stealing.”) While I’m generally sympathetic, I think Winans glosses over a couple of things. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 8:59 am
Here, I emphasize the experience of the Securities and Exchange Commission in recent years, as it has been forced to engage closely with both its transnational and foreign counterparts, and sub-national regulators seeking to leave their mark on the markets - and perhaps to win their state governorship. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
When the case was pending in the Second Circuit Court, the Justice Department's Antitrust Division opposed immunity for aftermarket trading in newly issued stocks, while the Securities and Exchange Commission favored immunity. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
When the case was pending in the Second Circuit Court, the Justice Department's Antitrust Division opposed immunity for aftermarket trading in newly issued stocks, while the Securities and Exchange Commission favored immunity. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
Field, "Bankruptcy, Debt, and the Macroeconomy, 1919-1946" (Abstract ID: 1109259) *** UNLV's Tuan Samahon, "Are Bankruptcy Judges Unconstitutional? [read post]
