Search for: "Fine v. French"
Results 301 - 320
of 525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Grosz v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
CNIL regarded these steps as insufficient and fined Google 100,000 Euros by way of sanction. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
This may not be a retrogression, as international instruments and legislation may provide more finely tuned tools to deal with the effect of foreign judgments. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Shack and Jacques v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm
If artists fail to adhere to the instructions in the CBO, they can be fined and jailed. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 10:22 pm
Ashby Donald and othrs. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Google’s First Amendment claim has a straightforward component based on a 1999 case, Ford v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Bronwen Energy Trading, Ltd.: Choice of law and choice of forum are the issues in this case, in which one defendant argues that the case should be dismissed because the parties agreed to resolve matters in Geneva, under Swiss law; and another party argues that its agreement called for the application of French law, to be decided in a French forum where proceedings are already pending. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Flinkkilä v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
France Karim Benzema’s defamation lawsuit against French Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, who claimed the French football star was “notoriously linked” to the Muslim Brotherhood, has been dismissed. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:30 am
The court in Goldin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:22 pm
It seems to say that even though one of the key principles/findings upon which the General Court’s decision was made was wrong, this was fine because if it had made the correct finding on that point, the General Court would still have been entitled to reach a final conclusion that there was a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 4:24 am
European Court of Human RightsTuskia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:37 pm
New York imposes a civil penalty for the parties to the contract, outlining a fine of $500 or less. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(IP Osgoode) Global - Patents Royalty rates in the telecommunications industry (IP finance) Canada Songwriters Association of Canada reveal new proposal to deal with P2P downloading at CIPPIC event (Excess Copyright) Green Party leader, Elizabeth May, advocates against ‘crazy copyright laws’ (Michael Geist) Radio-Canada issues YouTube takedown over Harper communion video (Michael Geist) Canada’s new commitment to boost the high-tech sector through… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:10 am
Today it was the turn of spirits, with Joined Cases C-4/10 and C-27/10 Bureau national interprofessionel du Cognac v Gust. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
shape) discussed before French court (Class 46) Germany German Bundestag meets innovation (IP:JUR) Bundesgerichtshof – comparison of (composite) marks: MIXI (Class 46) Hungary Is it worth bothering if all you get is Hungary? [read post]
