Search for: "Fox Broadcasting Company"
Results 301 - 320
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
John Thune (R-SD) affects local broadcast stations such as affiliates of NBC, CBS, ABC, and Fox. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
So if you are a sophisticated buyer of sports content, like Fox Broadcasting Company or Time Warner Cable, are you going to pay the same dollar amount for the Clippers as you did for the Lakers? [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES D. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
In May 2012 Scotland Yard warned the parent company, News Corp, that News International was under &l [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
The Supreme Court recently ruled against the company, stating that it’s retransmitting of broadcaster signals amounted to a copyright infringement. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES D. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:05 am
Included in those who brought the law suit were ABC, CBS, NBC, and FOX. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
” http://t.co/PwGHvNNZn5 -> Quasi-Broadcasting and Copyright – End of an Aereo? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
On Monday, I looked at the majority’s opinion in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
Since 2011 they have been applying for a compulsory license to stream broadcaster content but were denied because they didn’t meet the definition of what was a cable company. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:32 am
Fox and others won a high-profile copyright case against upstart Aereo on Wednesday, in which the Supreme Court held in a 6-3 vote that Aereo was offering services akin to a cable company and therefore needed the broadcasters' permission to retransmit their content to online viewers. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
” In American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
Cable companies are required (oddly enough, by the Copyright Act, instead of where it really belongs, the Communications Act) to pay retransmission fees to the network broadcasters when they re-transmit the signals transmitted over-the-air by the broadcasters to cable company subscribers, because the Copyright Act deems them (the cable companies) to be “transmitting performances of copyrighted works to the public. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:04 am
Fox Broadcasting even indicated that, should Aereo be permitted to remain in business, Fox may seriously consider getting out of the broadcast business entirely. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm
In a flurry of litigation, major broadcasters including ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox, are asking the courts to stop Aereo. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
If the court rules for the broadcasting companies, the Aereo business model will be finished. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:32 am
”The company's fate was placed in the hands of the Supreme Court when ABC network, CBS Broadcasting, Comcast's NBCUniversal and Twenty-First Century Fox appealed a decision by the 2nd U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:59 pm
Here’s the lowdown on American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
In Aereo, U.S. broadcast companies, including NBC, CBS, and FOX, have sued Aereo, a company that distributes TV programming on the Internet, for copyright infringement and the issue raised is whether a company “publicly performs” a copyrighted television program when it transmits the program from individual antennas to paid subscribers over the Internet. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
The ACA – which represents some 850 smaller and medium-sized, independent cable companies – has filed an amicus brief urging the Court to uphold the legality of Aereo’s technology as safely fitting within the tradition of maintaining the public’s ability to access freely available local broadcast TV signals, and reject the copyright claims from broadcast companies to "protect business models and erect pay walls". [read post]
