Search for: "Fox v Mark"
Results 301 - 320
of 827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Mark Lewis Law v Taylor Hampton, heard 25-27 and 30-31 October 2017 (Moulder J). [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
When a cable news show staffs its “panel of experts” to discuss these cases solely with political reporters and pundits, they are missing the mark. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
" And so, begins Mermeren v Fox Marble [2017] EWHC 1408 a (relatively) recent IPEC decision about trade marks and geographical names.The Claimant, Mermeren, is a Macedonian company which has been extracting marble from the Prilep area since 1950 and owns the EU mark SIVEC for "marble of all types" and other things. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:52 am
Twentieth Century Fox Television v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
On Thursday 2 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Comic Enterprises Ltd. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
deals with the issues The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd began this week before Moulder J. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd & Anor v Taylor Hampton Solicitors Ltd & Anor will begin in the High Court this week. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
Fox & Brad R. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
The removal of the own name defence and fundamental rights – Sky v SkyKickSky v SkyKick [2017] EWHC 1769 (Ch) (July 2017)Most trade mark lawyers know Sky’s reputation for pursuing action against anyone using the word SKY in their name, even SKYPE. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Matauszak, 415 Fed.Appx. 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (`[A] court cannot create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading’) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Payne v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am
A variety of principles are applied when considering a likelihood of confusion, set out in more detail in the decision of Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (discussed more here).An alternate claim under section 10(3) of the TMA sets out that a trademark is infringed when it a person "…uses in the course of trade, in relation to goods or services, a sign which is identical with or similar to the trade mark, where the trade… [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
The 2012 Supreme Court opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
” TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
Education attorney Lori Fox’s essay analyzes the Court’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
