Search for: "Frederick v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm by Richard A. Epstein
What follows are my impressions of the oral argument that took place in Pacific Operators Offshore v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:14 am by zshapiro
The State now has ninety days to reoffer the offer made at the plea bargain or to release Titlow. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
 On March 19, 2007, the United States Supreme Court heard this "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, formally known as  Morse v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Keaton, No. 101,480 (Oct. 2, 2009); Maradeth Frederick; affirming Judge Fleming's suppression order under GantState v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant’s retrospective complaints about plaintiff’s recommendations and trial are an insufficient basis to show that plaintiff’s decisions are actionable (Rodriguez v Fredericks, 213 AD2d 176, 178 [1st Dept 1995], lv denied 85 NY2d 812 [1995]). [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
On November 17, 2022, Newman Ferrara’s Civil Rights Practice Group, along with the Law Offices of Frederick K. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie hopes that in Janus v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am by Bob Kraft
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]