Search for: "G.L. "
Results 301 - 320
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2013, 12:39 pm
Since G.L. 94C Section 32L was passed many lawyers warned their clients that sharing a joint with a friend might be considered a crime and that being caught engaging in that conduct would, at a minimum result in an arrest. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:31 pm
In Massachusetts, under G.L. c.89, Sec. 11, pedestrians have the right of way when crossing in a crosswalk. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:53 pm
G.L., 191 N.J. 596, 605 (2007)). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
AIG moved for summary judgment, arguing that: (i) it was immune from suit under St.1966, c. 427, because it had reason to believe the plaintiff committed insurance fraud and properly reported the suspected fraud to the Insurance Fraud Bureau (“IFB”); and (ii) the plaintiff’s claims were barred by workers’ compensation exclusivity under G.L. c. 152.The Justices were unmoved by AIG’s arguments. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 8:52 pm
The Court concluded that the determination whether an employee's injury is compensable under the Workmans' Compensation Act, G.L. c. 152, § 24, and whether the exclusivity provision applied, did not turn on whether a claimant was entitled to or actually receives compensation under the act. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:36 pm
Even though the arresting officer qualified as a drug recognition expert, a rarity in Massachusetts, the conviction was reversed due to the fact that the district attorney was unable to prove that these drugs comported with the prohibitions of G.L. c. 94C sec. 1. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 10:26 pm
The Massachusetts child enticement statute is G.L. c. 265 sec. 26(C). [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:14 pm
G.L. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:20 am
G.L. c. 265, §13L. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:14 pm
Doherty sought review pursuant to G.L. c. 40A, § 17, and the Land Court judge entered judgment affirming the board’s decision and dismissing Doherty’s complaint. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
In re G.L., 329 Ill.App.3d 18 (1st 2002)-Mother’s parental rights terminated where she did not visit her five kids for over two years before the termination hearing. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:06 pm
Ao seguir o relator, os ministros Rosa Weber e Luiz Fux destacaram a grande quantidade de cocaína (mais de 162 kg) e de armas apreendidas na operação que resultou na prisão, e o fato de G.L. ter sido condenado por homicídio qualificado e responder a outro processo por falso – tanto que foi transferido para presídio de segurança máxima em Mato Grosso do Sul. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:55 am
The statute addressing that crime is G.L. c. 266 Section 15. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:22 pm
Cocaine trafficking in Massachusetts is a crime under G.L. c. 94C sec. 32E(b). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:10 pm
The Planning Board’s final action came within 90 days of the close of the public hearing on August 16, 2012, and was thus valid under G.L. c. 40A, § 9. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 5:12 am
The trustees of the real estate trust that owned abutting land appealed the special permit pursuant to G.L. c. 40A, § 17. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:59 am
Instances Where G.L. c. 269 §10(h) Is Charged There are times when the prosecutor will charge the non-mandatory portion of this statute. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
The Massachusetts wiretapping statute (G.L> c. 272, Section 99) is directed at preventing people from secretly recording one and other without consent. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:19 am
Accordingly, the Court determined that it was the trial justice’s responsibility, and the Court’s function, to adopt the interpretation of the zoning ordinance that would best carry out its evident purpose.In doing so, the Supreme Court concluded that, as a public charter school, RISE’s operation is considered a municipal use under the city’s zoning ordinance because, pursuant to the Charter Public School Act of Rhode Island, G.L. 1956 chapter 77 of title 16,… [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
While the district court held that a plaintiff would have to demonstrate a tangible economic injury in order to maintain a suit for violation of §105, the SJC took a broader view: When a merchant acquires personal identification information in violation of § 105 (a ) and uses the information for its own business purposes, whether by sending the customer unwanted marketing materials or by selling the information for a profit, the merchant has caused the consumer an injury that… [read post]
