Search for: "G.L. "
Results 301 - 320
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am
G.L. c. 208, § 48. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:15 pm
The Plaintiff’s failure to notify the Defendant within 30 days of the incident, as required by G.L. c. 84, § 18, a prerequisite to a party bringing this cause of action, prevents the claim from being heard. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
And the late Justice G.L. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:57 pm
Defaulting After Arraignment or Release By Court Order or Other Lawful Authority There is a statute in Massachusetts, G.L. c. 276 Sec. 82A that makes it a crime to default after your have been arraigned or released by a court order or some other lawful authority. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:16 am
An excerpt: The defendant, the State of Rhode Island (State), appeals from the entry of partial summary judgment in the Superior Court for the plaintiff, the Narragansett Indian Tribe (Tribe), finding that the plaintiff had standing to pursue a constitutional challenge to the 2011 Casino Act, G.L. 1956 § 42-61.2-2.1, as enacted by P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 25, § 2.1 This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on December 4, 2013, pursuant to an order directing the… [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:36 pm
Even though the arresting officer qualified as a drug recognition expert, a rarity in Massachusetts, the conviction was reversed due to the fact that the district attorney was unable to prove that these drugs comported with the prohibitions of G.L. c. 94C sec. 1. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:36 pm
Even though the arresting officer qualified as a drug recognition expert, a rarity in Massachusetts, the conviction was reversed due to the fact that the district attorney was unable to prove that these drugs comported with the prohibitions of G.L. c. 94C sec. 1. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 3:53 pm
Some dependency cases are totally easy. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:52 am
College or university police officers are appointed as special State officers under a Massachusetts statute (G.L. c. 22C, § 63) that grants them the same authority to make arrests as regular police officers for any criminal offense within their particular jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:06 am
Velasquez has been charged with several offenses, including motor vehicle homicide while under the influence of alcohol in violation of G.L. c. 90 § 24G, two counts of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol resulting in serious injury in violation of G.L. c. 90 § 24L, and several civil traffic violations. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:06 am
Velasquez has been charged with several offenses, including motor vehicle homicide while under the influence of alcohol in violation of G.L. c. 90 § 24G, two counts of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol resulting in serious injury in violation of G.L. c. 90 § 24L, and several civil traffic violations. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:43 pm
Galvin, Mass: Supreme Judicial Court 2013, the court examined the case of a defendant who was caught in the middle of changes made to G.L. c. 94C, § 32A (d) (§ 32A [d]), which was reduced effective August 2, 2012. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:12 am
College or university police officers are appointed as special State police officers under a Massachusetts statute (G.L. c. 22C, § 63) that grants them the same authority to make arrests as regular police officers for any criminal offense within their jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 2:56 am
In Massachusetts, a defendant charged with a drug possession crime could face severe violations if he or she was arrested within a "school zone," as defined by G.L. c. 94C § 32J. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:38 am
M.G.L. c. 152, §25A; G.L. c. 152, § 66. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:38 am
M.G.L. c. 152, §25A; G.L. c. 152, § 66. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:36 pm
This act is prohibited by G.L. c. 269 Sec. 10(m). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:04 pm
G.L. c. 265, § 13H. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:50 pm
In Massachusetts, bail hearings are controlled by G.L. c. 276, § 58. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:31 am
Golchin filed her lawsuit in Worcester Superior Court in September 2008, alleging a breach of contract, a breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and a violation of G.L. c. 93A, § 2. [read post]
