Search for: "GAINES v. USA"
Results 301 - 320
of 499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
The actual merger will not take place until General Convention meets, probably two years from now, to approve it pursuant to Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:54 am
CRUMPTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
Food Safety News requested an interview with FSIS to gain additional context for the emails, but the agency declined. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:15 am
Carson Optical, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:31 am
AEGON USA, LLC, 770 F. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
But bishops who testify outside their dioceses in support of the party line -- such as the Presiding Bishop herself, who signed an amicus brief in the Dixon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:17 am
At issue is whether the landmark Supreme Court opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
Mark Lawrence (formerly of the Episcopal Church (USA), and now -- still regarded by everyone but ECUSA as an Anglican bishop -- of the Anglican Communion at large). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:52 pm
January 28, 2013 In a decision in December, issued today (see: Green v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
All the contributors are important contracts scholars in their own right: David Campbell and John Wightman from the UK, Brian Bix, Jay Feinman, Robert Gordon, Claire Hill, Charles Knapp, Ethan Leib, Deborah Post, Edward Rubin, Carol Sanger, Robert Scott, Gordon Smith, Josh Whitford (with Li-Wen Lin) and William Woodward from the USA. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
This system would be backed up by the threat of direct statutory regulation (by a “backstop regulator”) if it fails to gain the support of the whole press industry. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
An English court should express no view about the law of the USA. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:49 am
Ware v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
The last two weeks of planning since my move to Kent have been both enjoyable and productive. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
The Federal crime of Money Laundering is traditionally understood to be the practice of filtering “dirty” money, or ill-gotten gains, through a series of transactions until the funds are “clean,” or appear to be proceeds from legal activities. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
