Search for: "GALL v GALL"
Results 301 - 320
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
Moreover, under the Supreme Court's guidance in Gall v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:54 pm
Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 987 (9th Cir. 2006) ("any post Booker decision" as to whether a case falls within the heartland "is subject to a unitary review for reasonableness"), and allowed by Gall v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:35 pm
The Sixth Circuit today, for example, in US v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
" In US v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
" In US v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
George's work in DC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
Take, for instance, the Michigan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:51 pm
We placed Heath's case in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in Gall v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:53 pm
WC I Waste Conversion Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:19 am
" United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
Rehearing en banc was ordered to allow the parties to brief the effect of the intervening decisions in Gall v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:44 pm
In the recent unpublished Appellate Division decision of Lucci v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Rosas, 8 NY3d 493, 499), the mens rea and actus reus in depraved indifference circumstances need not necessarily be simultaneous (see generally People v Kibbe, 35 NY2d 407; People v Galle, 77 NY2d 953 [criminally negligent homicide]). [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:11 am
I think they're predicting that one correctly.In an Ohio case, Gall v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:26 pm
" Gall, 128 S. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:26 am
Today's opinion, in Nelson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court released a Per Curiam opinion in Spears v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:44 am
Of course, we could echo Justice Scalia's words about Bush v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:26 pm
The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Gall v. [read post]
