Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE et al"
Results 301 - 320
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (argued February 27, 2013) and 3) offers of judgment under FRCP Rule 68 in Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions and the effect on FRCP Rule 23 class actions (Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
Appeals -- Certiorari -- No basis for certiorari review regarding grant of motion for protective order as to interrogatories and order declaring plaintiff a “vexatious litigant” -- Jurisdiction -- Appeal of dismissal for failure to state a cause of action with leave for plaintiff to amend is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the dismissal is a non-final orderPATRICK NEPTUNE, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Its proceedings would necessarily be ex parte and in secret, and, like a FISA court, I suspect almost all of the government’s applications would be granted, because, like a FISA application, the government would be sure to present a compelling case. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Kitch, Graham v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
More Blog Posts: Washington DC Car Accident Lawsuit Alleges Direct Negligence and Respondeat Superior: Lewis-Shephard v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:16 am
In Big Sky Colony et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
AAR MANUFACTURING, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
Strine, Jr., et al. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
United States Patent & Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Washington State Democratic Central Committee v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Audretsch et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm
Booth Jr., et al. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Paragraphs 7-10 of the Complaint say Madsen, Dougherty, Hillman and Grives (i) are “United States citizen[s] and resident[s] of the State of California” and (ii) were, at “all times relevant” to the claims in the Complaint, “supervisory employee[s] of . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:09 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
