Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 37,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
The Supreme Court recently reviewed Matal, Interim Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:23 pm
  As the opening paragraph of the majority opinion accurately states the issue:"The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the regulations implementing it require group health plans to cover contraceptive care without cost sharing. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
In the light of this development the defendant, News Group Newspapers, applied to discharge the injunction in its entirety. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:20 pm
Politico has an article up this week about "the birthers," a fringe group that challenges the validity of Obama's ascendency to the presidency on the alleged basis that he was born outside the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:42 am
  This decision is generally viewed as a companion to Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:52 pm by Eric Winder Sella
On Monday, March 25, 2019, the United States Supreme Court held oral argument on Dutra Group v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 11:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ motion for summary judgment and ejectment order in an action brought by a group of recreational vehicle owners seeking to retain their rights to remain on a lakeside RV park located on American Indian land held in trust by the Bureau. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:21 am
In case you are wondering, the Broussards were represented by William Walker, not the Scruggs Katrina Group. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
According to the court ruling, Penguin had to show it suffered injury "within the state," which the lower court ruled it did not. [read post]