Search for: "Gao v. State " Results 301 - 320 of 489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm by Kurt Carroll
A 2010 GAO report found that United States Attorneys declined to prosecute 52% of the cases classified as violent crimes in fiscal years 2005 through 2009. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:55 am by admin
” … As the GAO has confirmed, the FDA “generally does not address misleading food labeling because it lacks the resources to conduct the substantive, empirical research on consumer perceptions. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the landmark case, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
The GAO report did not touch fully on the litigation cost element as their sample data was not sufficient. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The State’s answer is quite silly — and what is getting picked up in the newspapers and perhaps some Justices gaoing all the way back to Kiowa itself — if France or Haiti opened a casino in Michigan then the State would be able to sue those foreign nations to get relief, but for some unexplained reason not Indian tribes (page 10 line 17 through page 17 line 21). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:44 am by Steven Koprince
The United States (Nov. 27, 2013) comes on the heels of a recent GAO decision reaching a similar result. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 2:43 pm by Monique Altheim
  Google’s Forum-Selection Clause Upheld AgainRudgayzer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]