Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation"
Results 301 - 320
of 790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2021, 11:48 am
Wallace, 297 So.2d 619 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Van Lare v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm
Leinweber Company, Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Company, and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Becton Dickinson; TiVo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:47 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2008 BCCA 27, 77 B.C.L.R. (4th) 142; Lewis v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 pm
In the recent federal case of Bingham v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Reinsurance Corporation v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
The Court will also hand down judgment in The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Bentley Motors (“Motors”) applied to invalidate this registration in 2015. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
(Abbott) v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:01 pm
General Motors Acceptance Corporation, No. 1-06-3417 (Ill. 1st. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:18 am
See Padgett v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
” Uncertainty After Culligan In a number of post-Culligan decisions, plaintiffs often argued, and lower courts generally rejected, the notion that Culligan impliedly overruled prior case law applying the laws of the state of incorporation to shareholder derivative standing: David Shaev Profit Sharing Plan v Bank of Am. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am
BROWN, Appellant v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 6:48 pm
Moore v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia Implication of subsequent, independent, damages Foley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.June 3, 2009 - 11 AM: In re Hyundai Motor America, Serial No. 78889340 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark ECHELON for "automobiles" in view of the identical mark registered for "automotive tires"].June 11, 2009 - 2 PM: General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
See, e.g., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
The Board of Appeal was also right in simply clarifying that, in Audi v OHIM the distinctiveness of Audi’s slogan mark had been affirmed, given that the sign was a widely known slogan, having been used for many years, and could also lead consumers to identify the commercial origin of the advertised motor vehicles. [read post]
