Search for: "Gerard Magliocca"
Results 301 - 320
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
(Randy Barnett) Over on Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca is bothered by my persistent claim that the health insurance mandate is “unprecedented”: Folks like Randy Barnett rely heavily on the idea that congressional regulation of inactivity (or commercial coercion) is unprecedented under the Commerce and Taxing Clauses. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:43 am
Gerard N. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:53 pm
Gerard Magliocca sees the Godfather through a property lens. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:16 am
[Yung, ConcurOp] History as advocacy: why one scholar would never sign onto a “Historians’ Brief,” even if he agreed with its contents [Gerard Magliocca, ConcurOp] Will new ABA accreditation standards require law schools to affirm a particular ideological line on diversity preferences? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
” At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca posts an abstract of his upcoming paper, which “looks at whether the Court will invalidate the individual mandate by examining how other transformative laws were treated under similar political circumstances. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and The Politics of Backlash (2011); Gerard N. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
” Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca ponders Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ use of the term “bad law. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Finally, in the spirit of the upcoming World Cup, Gerard Magliocca at Concurring Opinions ponders the ways in which the role of a Supreme Court justice might be more akin to that of a soccer referee than to a baseball umpire. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:03 am
At the Atlantic’s Night Beat column, Marc Ambinder previews the next steps for the Obama administration in the confirmation process, and finally, Gerard Magliocca argues that Kagan is a “lackluster” choice for the nomination at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:23 pm
At the Atlantic’s Night Beat column, Marc Ambinder previews the next steps for the Obama administration in the confirmation process, and finally, Gerard Magliocca argues that Kagan is a “lackluster” choice for the nomination at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 8:17 am
Over at CoOp, Gerard Magliocca has an interesting post comparing the maritime doctrine of general average, where some compensation is owed to people whose property is destroyed to save a ship, and the property doctrine of necessity, which holds that... [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am
At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca writes that the delay in releasing an opinion for Bilski v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Josh Blackman has a recap at his blog, while Gerard Magliocca at Concurring Opinions highlights a few key moments from what he characterizes as an otherwise “dull” argument. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
And Gerard Magliocca of Concurring Opinions shares Whelan’s recusal concern and deems it “not clear that Kagan has been a good Solicitor General. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:11 am
(Have I spoken recently about Gerard Magliocca's really good book on constitutional thought in the age of Jackson? [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
REFORMING THE FILIBUSTER Gerard N. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Balkin and Gerard Magliocca both have argued that for Obama to be a realigning/transformative/reconstructive president, he must confront and overcome pre-existing political structures and assumptions, usually by playing constitutional hardball and rallying the public behind that hardball. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 12:54 am
Gerard Magliocca (Indiana-Indy), newly installed chair of the AALS section on maritime law, is creating a panel for next year's AALS annual meeting. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:06 pm
" Justice Samuel Alito could be seen mouthing words and in particular, per Gerard Magliocca, the phrase "That's not true". [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 1:59 pm
The White Whale of Comprehensive Reform posted by Gerard Magliocca Two years ago I wrote an article about patent trolls that said the problem (if you think it is a problem) could not be solved by a broad legislative approach. [read post]
