Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 301 - 320
of 75,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 6:01 am
In Boeing Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
NOT IN MY CITY: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT GIVEN TEETH IN NIMBY DISPUTE: PASTER PREVAILS IN FIGHT TO HAVE HALFWAY HOUSE ZONED OUT OF THE WAY.Barr v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:03 pm
If the rule requires notice, but no notice is given, you don't sentence someone to a shorter sentence than you think is appropriate. [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:23 pm
Venugopal v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:47 pm
SCOTUSBLOG is the NY Times, or maybe - given its focus on one particular field - the Wall Street Journal, of the legal blog world. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Matter of City of New York v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 7:50 am
Early in last week's argument in Packingham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:52 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Testimony that: (A) was given as a witness at a trial, hearing, or lawful deposition, whether given during the current proceeding or a different one; and... [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:31 am
In Muldrow v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
Jump Rope Systems is asking the full Federal Circuit to overturn its own decision in XY, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:26 am
Regina (Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and others intervening) [2010] EWCACiv 1094; [2010] WLR (D) 251 “Legal advice privilege applied only to advice given by a member of the legal profession. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:30 pm
In McNally v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 4:30 am
Reliance was asserted upon the contractual documentation in this case, in that the participants were given the right to control in accordance with their terms. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:41 am
From Friend v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:33 am
Thus, the judgment was reversed to the extent that it decided to award profits and the case remanded fort a new trial on that issue (Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
Jordache" trademark for blue jeans was not infringed by manufacturer that identified its blue jeans for larger women with smiling pig and word "Lardashe" on seat of pants; striking dissimilarities in designs used in marks greatly outweighed any similarities, manufacturer intended to parody but that intent was not to confuse the public, and survey given by trademark owner did not demonstrate actual confusion.Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
