Search for: "Golden v. State of California"
Results 301 - 320
of 584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
A California state appellate court has ruled that a state law requiring collection of a DNA sample for those simply arrested on felony suspicions—but not charged, much less convicted—violates the Golden State’s constitution. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
On November 11, 2014, the California Supreme Court rejected the recent California Court of Appeals decision Golden State Boring & Pipe Jacking, Inc. v Eastern Municipal Water District,… [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:47 am
In fact, Florida had only about a million fewer uninsured drivers than California, even though The Golden State boasts a population nearly twice the size of The Sunshine State. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Ayala, 13-1428, a state-on-top two-time relist outta the Golden State, asks whether the conclusion a claim represents harmless error is an “adjudication on the merits” under the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
In Ohio State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I describe yet another blow to the California statutes and constitutional provisions that set up the Golden State’s direct democracy system. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 1:19 pm
The history of this case should make these FedEx drivers exceedingly happy that they live in the Golden State of California. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:05 am
In Doe I v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The case is Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:14 pm
’ ” Delaney v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
In other words, neither the parties nor the particular products consumed by these plaintiffs ever reached the shores of the Golden State, yet the defendant manufacturer will be held to answer.How can this be? [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
As to the second, adequate information, the Judicial Counsel has presented parties with a golden opportunity to bridge the information gap: Construction Form Interrogatories. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court’s recognized in concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Cooke and Golden v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
The unanimous decision in the case, known as The People of California v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:51 am
California recently established a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”) that attempts to rate the “carbon intensity” of liquid fuels, so that carbon emissions can be reduced in the Golden State. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
Cisco and EFF's Kidane v. [read post]
