Search for: "Goldstein v Held" Results 301 - 320 of 886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Re-list watch
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Donley, 10-374, is being held awaiting the respondents’ response in Wetherill v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Petitions to watch | Conference of June 11
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
Bruce v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Monday round-up
12 Mar 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
On Friday, the court removed Salt River Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Thursday round-up
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
Pepper v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Opinion analysis: Scope of federal preclusion of state law actions
28 Feb 2014, 9:19 am by Allen Ferrell
In the recently decided Chadbourne & Parke v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Relist (and Hold) (and CFRecord) Watch
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases, among other things. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Petitions to watch | Conference of December 5
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am by Maureen Johnston
Gordon v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public hearing was held. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A public hearing was held. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Wednesday round-up
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Finally, in Jesner v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Apple on losing track against Epic Games: reversal of market definition and remand for further consideration most likely outcome of Ninth Circuit antitrust appeal
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm by Florian Mueller
" The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit just held its Epic Games v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
Relist Watch
16 Mar 2017, 6:49 am by John Elwood
Payne v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Tuesday round-up
25 Nov 2014, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
At ThinkProgress, Bryce Covert reports that forty-three “sexual harassment cases have been dismissed” in the wake of Vance v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Coming to the Supreme Court Next Term
21 Apr 2009, 9:01 am
Van de Kamp v. [read post]
StandDown Texas Project - http://standdown.typepad.com/weblog/
Justices send securities class action against Goldman Sachs back to lower court
21 Jun 2021, 8:43 am by Ronald Mann
In its opinion in Goldman Sachs Group v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
New York Law Journal Featured Columnists June 25, 2008
25 Jun 2008, 8:20 am
Rikon"Michael Rikon, a partner of Goldstein, Goldstein, Rikon & Gottlieb, and Joshua H. [read post]
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library - http://crimlawlib.blogspot.com/
Argument analysis: How wrong was the Eleventh Circuit about the First Amendment protections for a public employee’s subpoenaed testimony?
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
Ceballos and Pickering v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Petitions to watch | Conference of November 25
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Digging In Unsuccessfully
15 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Matter of Goldstein v Zabel, 146 AD3d 624, 631 (1st Dept 2017). [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Monday round-up
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am by Marissa Miller
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/